Seven.One Entertainment Group
seven.one
supplier case study · Source checked 2026-10-04
Seven.One data engineering and Reach pipelines; workers described on AWS ECS. Current payment and runtime unverified.
← All company lists
Data platforms · October 2026 research
Companies and websites using Prefect
Find companies and properties to review for Prefect services and integrations.
The research date describes the saved package. Inclusion does not confirm present use or a paid subscription.
Choose the Prefect list
26 reviewed company accounts
Package dated
26 reviewed Prefect company accounts. Internal data workflows, service implementations and product configuration; older stories retain their publication dates. Claims apply to the recorded property, product or workload.
Price and delivery by enquiry
Enquire about this packageDownload the contact-free CSV previewWhat is included
Enquire about the dated 26-account Prefect dataset. Confirm included company fields, source attribution and scope before private delivery.
Organization or website identity
Technology attribution
Recorded source and check dates
Property or workload scope
Reviewed contact-free examples
These approved examples illustrate the 2026-10-05 package. They are not a representative sample of all customers.
Barstool Sports
barstoolsports.com
supplier case study · Source checked 2026-10-04
Data operations; workerless Prefect Cloud with AWS ECS and deployment configuration. Current payment and runtime unverified.
Flatiron Health
flatiron.com
supplier case study · Source checked 2026-10-04
Real-world evidence data platform on EKS; Maestro service coordinates Prefect Cloud. Current payment and runtime unverified.
Clearcover
clearcover.com
supplier case study · Source checked 2026-10-04
Internal data engineering ETL workflows; supplier describes roughly 50–75 ingestion flows. Current payment and runtime unverified.
What we found in this list
WhosBuilt analysis of the saved October 2026 package. Findings describe this selected cohort, not market share.
Worker environments and data workflows
The saved workloads include AWS ECS and EKS worker arrangements, internal ETL, MLOps and selected AI workflows. Historical stories and product configuration remain separate from current runtime.
Qualify the worker environment and workflow before proposing an orchestration migration.
Selected dated research cohort; present runtime, paid use, organization-wide deployment and outreach permission remain unverified. Descriptions and supplier claims apply only to their recorded scope and source date.
Package 2026-10-05 · reviewed company accounts · WhosBuilt saved-record analysis
How this list was checked
Original cohort dated 2026-10-05. Retained source-check dates span 2026-10-04 to 2026-10-05 UTC; missing original check or review times remain unknown. Recovery revision reviewed 2026-10-11. Recovery is not a source refresh or a current adoption date. Historical publication dates and account scopes remain attached to delivered rows.
26 reviewed Prefect company accounts. Internal data workflows, service implementations and product configuration; older stories retain their publication dates. Claims apply to the recorded property, product or workload.
| Source class | Count | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| supplier case study | Not separately counted | Supplier-reported relationship at the original source date; present use remains unverified. |
| first party engineering disclosure | Not separately counted | Saved scoped organization disclosure; authorization or a publication is not independent runtime proof. |
| first party product design | Not separately counted | Saved scoped organization disclosure; authorization or a publication is not independent runtime proof. |
| first party configuration | Not separately counted | Saved public configuration or resource reference; execution and organization-wide adoption are unverified. |
Worker environments and data workflows: Qualitative synthesis of retained accepted workload scopes; presence only, with no prevalence or market-share claim. WhosBuilt analysis of saved accepted fields for the dated October research cohort; no source refresh.
Original cohort and source dates are retained. The October 11 revision review does not establish adoption or continued deployment on that date. Missing dates and historical statements retain their original limitations.
- Public sources do not confirm current paid subscriptions, live runtime, organization-wide deployment or purchasing intent.
- Source retrieval dates record access; they do not make older statements or historical deployments current.
- Some accounts have no retained contact. Published routes retain their purpose restrictions and grant no outreach permission or deliverability guarantee.
Source access dates do not refresh historical statements. Static signals do not prove execution, payment or buying intent. Published contacts do not establish deliverability or outreach permission.
Choose the Prefect list
26 reviewed company accounts
Package dated
26 reviewed Prefect company accounts. Internal data workflows, service implementations and product configuration; older stories retain their publication dates. Claims apply to the recorded property, product or workload.
Price and delivery by enquiry
Enquire about this packageDownload the contact-free CSV previewPaid files are licensed for internal use; no resale or redistribution.